New Title: Federal Appeals Court Raises Concerns about Constitutionality of Biden’s Pistol Brace Regulation

Supporters of the Second Amendment Argue for the Safety of Pistol Braces

Advocates for the Second Amendment contend that pistol braces are accessories that enhance handgun safety and accuracy. They believe that these accessories are a valuable addition to firearms.

Gun Control Advocates Highlight Worries about Concealable Handguns

Conversely, advocates for gun control express concerns that pistol braces have the potential to transform concealable handguns into more dangerous weapons.

Overview of the Regulation

In response to recent shootings in Boulder, Colorado; Dayton, Ohio; and Nashville, Tennessee, where stabilizing braces were utilized, President Biden introduced a regulation in 2021. The regulation mandated gun owners to register pistol braces and pay a fee, and it officially went into effect on June 1.

Legal Challenge against the Regulation

A lawsuit was filed by two gun owners from Texas, a gun rights group, and a gun dealer, contesting the law. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary block on the regulation for the plaintiffs, their customers, and members.

Uncertainty regarding the Future of the Regulation

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans voiced doubts about the viability of the Biden administration’s rule, stating that it is unlikely to withstand a legal challenge. The court extended the block on enforcement for 60 days and referred the case back to U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor in Texas. The situation remains uncertain as several other courts have also issued orders against the federal registration rule since May, impacting a considerable number of individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *